linux-kernel - Re: [patch V4 part 1 19/36] x86/entry: Exclude low level entry code from sanitizing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1733222250.20139.1589410738477.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 18:58:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:   Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To:     Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "Joel Fernandes, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 19/36] x86/entry: Exclude low level entry code
 from sanitizing

----- On May 6, 2020, at 12:03 PM, Alexandre Chartre alexandre.chartre@...cle.com wrote:

> On 5/5/20 3:16 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> The sanitizers are not really applicable to the fragile low level entry
>> code. code. Entry code needs to carefully setup a normal 'runtime'
> 
> typo: code. code.

Looking at updated tree, the reviewed-by is there, but there is still
way too much "code". ;)

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
> 
> alex.
> 
> 
>> environment.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/entry/Makefile |    8 ++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> 
>> --- a/arch/x86/entry/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/Makefile
>> @@ -3,6 +3,14 @@
>>   # Makefile for the x86 low level entry code
>>   #
>>   
>> +KASAN_SANITIZE := n
>> +UBSAN_SANITIZE := n
>> +KCOV_INSTRUMENT := n
>> +
>> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_common.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector
>> -fstack-protector-strong
>> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_32.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector
>> -fstack-protector-strong
>> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_syscall_64.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE) -fstack-protector
>> -fstack-protector-strong
>> +
>>   OBJECT_FILES_NON_STANDARD_entry_64_compat.o := y
>>   
>>   CFLAGS_syscall_64.o		+= $(call cc-option,-Wno-override-init,)

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com