[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zhac4a0x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 08:35:42 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 3 08/29] x86/entry/64: Provide sane error entry/exit
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> On Tue, 05 May 2020 15:44:02 +0200
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> + .if \sane == 0
>> TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>
> Are you implying that TRACE_IRQS_OFF is insane?
Very much so.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists