linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 09/17] drm/amdgpu: use dma-fence annotations in cs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6cfd324e-0443-3a12-6a2c-25a546c68643@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 09:02:38 +0200
From:   Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/17] drm/amdgpu: use dma-fence annotations in cs_submit()

Am 12.05.20 um 10:59 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> This is a bit tricky, since ->notifier_lock is held while calling
> dma_fence_wait we must ensure that also the read side (i.e.
> dma_fence_begin_signalling) is on the same side. If we mix this up
> lockdep complaints, and that's again why we want to have these
> annotations.
>
> A nice side effect of this is that because of the fs_reclaim priming
> for dma_fence_enable lockdep now automatically checks for us that
> nothing in here allocates memory, without even running any userptr
> workloads.
>
> Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
> Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> index 7653f62b1b2d..6db3f3c629b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
> @@ -1213,6 +1213,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>   	struct amdgpu_job *job;
>   	uint64_t seq;
>   	int r;
> +	bool fence_cookie;
>   
>   	job = p->job;
>   	p->job = NULL;
> @@ -1227,6 +1228,8 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>   	 */
>   	mutex_lock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
>   
> +	fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
> +
>   	/* If userptr are invalidated after amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(), return
>   	 * -EAGAIN, drmIoctl in libdrm will restart the amdgpu_cs_ioctl.
>   	 */
> @@ -1264,12 +1267,14 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
>   	amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(p->adev, &fpriv->vm);
>   
>   	ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&p->ticket, &p->validated, p->fence);
> +	dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);

Mhm, this could come earlier in theory. E.g. after pushing the job to 
the scheduler.

Christian.

>   	mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
>   
>   	return 0;
>   
>   error_abort:
>   	drm_sched_job_cleanup(&job->base);
> +	dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
>   	mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
>   
>   error_unlock: