[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB0TPYHikHc3tTTQcUOOZsYZmqNxGtthpkPX_z6dKgy+V8kovg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:07:43 +0200
From: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Narayan Kamath <narayan@...gle.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] loop: Add LOOP_CONFIGURE ioctl
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:30 AM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> > Looks acceptable to me, but I'm getting a failure applying it to
> > for-5.8/drivers on this patch:
> >
> > Applying: loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation
> >
> > So you'll probably want to respin on the right branch.
This series depends on a separate bugfix I sent to LKML earlier - see
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/31/755 . I mentioned it in [00/10] of
this series, but perhaps I should have just included that patch.
I just verified that patch + this series still applies cleanly on your
for-5.8/drivers tree, but if you prefer I send a v5 with that patch
going first let me know.
Thanks,
Martijn
>
> Then you can also drop patch #1.
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists