lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 09:12:13 +0200
From:   "Fuzzey, Martin" <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>
To:     Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        mark.rutland@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 RESEND 03/13] Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix context cache"

On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 08:07, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:32:26AM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
> > This reverts commit d288bddd8374e0a043ac9dde64a1ae6a09411d74, since
> > 'context_loaded' finally removed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> > ---
>
> I think this can safely be folded into the next patch which makes it
> more clear what is happening.
>

Agreed,
not only that but having 2 separate patches also means that the bug
that was fixed by the commit being reverted could reappear during
bisection.

More generally I think reverts should be reserved for commits that
later turn out to be wrong or unneeded (ie should never really have
been applied).
If they were OK at the time but later become unnecessary due to other
code changes I think all the related modifications should be done in a
single normal non revert patch.

Martin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ