[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB66381C7FAC6EA04658C3176389BF0@VE1PR04MB6638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 08:06:31 +0000
From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
To: "Fuzzey, Martin" <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC: "vkoul@...nel.org" <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 RESEND 03/13] Revert "dmaengine: imx-sdma: fix context
cache"
On 2020/05/13 Fuzzey, Martin <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 08:07, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:32:26AM +0800, Robin Gong wrote:
> > > This reverts commit d288bddd8374e0a043ac9dde64a1ae6a09411d74, since
> > > 'context_loaded' finally removed.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
> > > ---
> >
> > I think this can safely be folded into the next patch which makes it
> > more clear what is happening.
> >
>
> Agreed,
> not only that but having 2 separate patches also means that the bug that was
> fixed by the commit being reverted could reappear during bisection.
>
> More generally I think reverts should be reserved for commits that later turn
> out to be wrong or unneeded (ie should never really have been applied).
> If they were OK at the time but later become unnecessary due to other code
> changes I think all the related modifications should be done in a single normal
> non revert patch.
Okay, will remove it in v8.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists