linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 48/48] ipc/mqueue.c: change __do_notify() to bypass check_kill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200513094405.122260162@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 11:45:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Yoji <yoji.fujihar.min@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>, 1vier1@....de,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 48/48] ipc/mqueue.c: change __do_notify() to bypass check_kill_permission()

From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit b5f2006144c6ae941726037120fa1001ddede784 ]

Commit cc731525f26a ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic")
changed the value of SI_FROMUSER(SI_MESGQ), this means that mq_notify() no
longer works if the sender doesn't have rights to send a signal.

Change __do_notify() to use do_send_sig_info() instead of kill_pid_info()
to avoid check_kill_permission().

This needs the additional notify.sigev_signo != 0 check, shouldn't we
change do_mq_notify() to deny sigev_signo == 0 ?

Test-case:

	#include <signal.h>
	#include <mqueue.h>
	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/wait.h>
	#include <assert.h>

	static int notified;

	static void sigh(int sig)
	{
		notified = 1;
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		signal(SIGIO, sigh);

		int fd = mq_open("/mq", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0666, NULL);
		assert(fd >= 0);

		struct sigevent se = {
			.sigev_notify	= SIGEV_SIGNAL,
			.sigev_signo	= SIGIO,
		};
		assert(mq_notify(fd, &se) == 0);

		if (!fork()) {
			assert(setuid(1) == 0);
			mq_send(fd, "",1,0);
			return 0;
		}

		wait(NULL);
		mq_unlink("/mq");
		assert(notified);
		return 0;
	}

[manfred@...orfullife.com: 1) Add self_exec_id evaluation so that the implementation matches do_notify_parent 2) use PIDTYPE_TGID everywhere]
Fixes: cc731525f26a ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic")
Reported-by: Yoji <yoji.fujihar.min@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: <1vier1@....de>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e2a782e4-eab9-4f5c-c749-c07a8f7a4e66@colorfullife.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 ipc/mqueue.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
index de4070d5472f2..46d0265423f5b 100644
--- a/ipc/mqueue.c
+++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ struct mqueue_inode_info {
 
 	struct sigevent notify;
 	struct pid *notify_owner;
+	u32 notify_self_exec_id;
 	struct user_namespace *notify_user_ns;
 	struct user_struct *user;	/* user who created, for accounting */
 	struct sock *notify_sock;
@@ -662,28 +663,44 @@ static void __do_notify(struct mqueue_inode_info *info)
 	 * synchronously. */
 	if (info->notify_owner &&
 	    info->attr.mq_curmsgs == 1) {
-		struct siginfo sig_i;
 		switch (info->notify.sigev_notify) {
 		case SIGEV_NONE:
 			break;
-		case SIGEV_SIGNAL:
-			/* sends signal */
+		case SIGEV_SIGNAL: {
+			struct siginfo sig_i;
+			struct task_struct *task;
+
+			/* do_mq_notify() accepts sigev_signo == 0, why?? */
+			if (!info->notify.sigev_signo)
+				break;
 
 			clear_siginfo(&sig_i);
 			sig_i.si_signo = info->notify.sigev_signo;
 			sig_i.si_errno = 0;
 			sig_i.si_code = SI_MESGQ;
 			sig_i.si_value = info->notify.sigev_value;
-			/* map current pid/uid into info->owner's namespaces */
 			rcu_read_lock();
+			/* map current pid/uid into info->owner's namespaces */
 			sig_i.si_pid = task_tgid_nr_ns(current,
 						ns_of_pid(info->notify_owner));
-			sig_i.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(info->notify_user_ns, current_uid());
+			sig_i.si_uid = from_kuid_munged(info->notify_user_ns,
+						current_uid());
+			/*
+			 * We can't use kill_pid_info(), this signal should
+			 * bypass check_kill_permission(). It is from kernel
+			 * but si_fromuser() can't know this.
+			 * We do check the self_exec_id, to avoid sending
+			 * signals to programs that don't expect them.
+			 */
+			task = pid_task(info->notify_owner, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+			if (task && task->self_exec_id ==
+						info->notify_self_exec_id) {
+				do_send_sig_info(info->notify.sigev_signo,
+						&sig_i, task, PIDTYPE_TGID);
+			}
 			rcu_read_unlock();
-
-			kill_pid_info(info->notify.sigev_signo,
-				      &sig_i, info->notify_owner);
 			break;
+		}
 		case SIGEV_THREAD:
 			set_cookie(info->notify_cookie, NOTIFY_WOKENUP);
 			netlink_sendskb(info->notify_sock, info->notify_cookie);
@@ -1273,6 +1290,7 @@ retry:
 			info->notify.sigev_signo = notification->sigev_signo;
 			info->notify.sigev_value = notification->sigev_value;
 			info->notify.sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL;
+			info->notify_self_exec_id = current->self_exec_id;
 			break;
 		}
 
-- 
2.20.1