lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c2795ed-c2cb-a166-cd6d-0e920bd05ea3@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 11:28:57 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        Tuan Phan <tuanphan@...amperecomputing.com>
Cc:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        patches@...erecomputing.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI/IORT: Fix PMCG node always look for a single ID
 mapping.

On 2020-05-13 4:16 am, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2020/5/13 7:56, Tuan Phan wrote:
>> PMCG node can have zero ID mapping if its overflow interrupt
>> is wire based. The code to parse PMCG node can not assume it will
>> have a single ID mapping.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <tuanphan@...amperecomputing.com>
> 
> It's better to add
> 
> Fixes: 24e516049360 ("ACPI/IORT: Add support for PMCG")
> 
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Used pmcg node to detect wired base overflow interrupt.
>>   drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 5 +++++
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index ed3d2d1..11a4e8e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node 
>> *iort_node_get_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
>>   static int iort_get_id_mapping_index(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
>>   {
>>       struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu;
>> +    struct acpi_iort_pmcg *pmcg;
>>       switch (node->type) {
>>       case ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3:
>> @@ -441,6 +442,10 @@ static int iort_get_id_mapping_index(struct 
>> acpi_iort_node *node)
>>           return smmu->id_mapping_index;
>>       case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG:
>> +        pmcg = (struct acpi_iort_pmcg *)node->node_data;
>> +        if (pmcg->overflow_gsiv)

	if (pmcg->overflow_gsiv || node->mapping_count == 0)

...if there is no GSIV, we should still *also* check that index 0 is 
valid before we return it.

Robin.

>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>>           return 0;
>>       default:
>>           return -EINVAL;
> 
> With my comments addressed,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guoahanjun@...wei.com>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ