[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200513111717.GA32365@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:17:17 +0100
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: f.fainelli@...il.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, wahrenst@....net,
helgaas@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, tim.gover@...pberrypi.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] USB: pci-quirks: Add Raspberry Pi 4 quirk
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:13:13PM +0200, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> On the Raspberry Pi 4, after a PCI reset, VL805's firmware may either be
> loaded directly from an EEPROM or, if not present, by the SoC's
> co-processor, VideoCore. This series adds support for the later.
>
> Note that there are a set of constraints we have to consider:
> - We need to make sure the VideoCore firmware interface is up and
> running before running the VL805 firmware load call.
>
> - There is no way to discern RPi4's VL805 chip from other platforms',
> so we need the firmware load to happen *before* running
> quirk_usb_handoff_xhci(). Failure to do so results in an unwarranted
> 5 second wait while the fixup code polls xHC's non-existing state.
>
> By Florian's suggestion I've been spending some time exploring the device
> link[1] API in order to see if that could save us from explicitly creating
> probe dependencies between pcie-brcmstb and firmware/raspberrypi (patch #3).
> Technically these dependencies could be inferred from DT. It turns out Saravana
> Kannan has been looking at this already. A new boot mechanism, activated with
> fw_devlink=on takes care of the device probe ordering on devices with
> consumer/supplier relationships. For now this relationship is created based on
> the usage of generic DT properties, but has no support for vendor-specifc DT
> properties, which we'd be forced to use in order to create a relationship
> between our two devices since our setup is highly non generic. There will
> probably be at some point support for such properties, and we will then be able
> to revisit some of this code.
>
> All this is based on the work by Tim Gover in RPi's downstream
> kernel[2].
>
> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.13/driver-api/device_link.html
> [2] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/commit/9935b4c7e360b4494b4cb6e3ce797238a1ab78bd
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v7:
> - Address Stefan's comments
>
> Changes since v6:
> - Make rpi_firmware_init_vl805() more robust
> - Rewrite comments and patch descriptions to be more accessible to non RPi
> fluent people
> - Removed Florian's Reviewed-by in patch #2 as function changed
> substantially
> - Tested with/witout u-boot
>
> Changes since v5:
> - Fix issues reported by Kbuild test robot
>
> Changes since v4:
> - Addressed Sergei's comments
> - Fix potential warning in patch #2
>
> Changes since v3:
> - Addressed Greg's comments
>
> There was no v2, my bad.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Addressed Floarians comments
>
> Nicolas Saenz Julienne (4):
> soc: bcm2835: Add notify xHCI reset property
> firmware: raspberrypi: Introduce vl805 init routine
> PCI: brcmstb: Wait for Raspberry Pi's firmware when present
> USB: pci-quirks: Add Raspberry Pi 4 quirk
>
> drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 3 +-
> drivers/firmware/raspberrypi.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 17 ++++++
> drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c | 16 ++++++
> include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h | 9 +++-
> 5 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Hi Nicolas,
should I queue this series via the PCI tree ? Just let me know, most of
the changes are not in the PCI tree, asking in order to
minimize/simplify conflicts handling if possible.
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists