linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Allow ld.lld to link the MIPS VDSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200513111806.GA7151@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 13:18:06 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Golovin <dima@...ovin.in>,
        Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Allow ld.lld to link the MIPS VDSO

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:28:43AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:05:09AM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > Please let me know if there are any issues!
> > 
> > I found no issues in my tests. Is this the final state ? If yes, I'm
> > going to apply it to mips-next.
> > 
> > Thomas.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
> > good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
> 
> Maciej seemed to have some issue with the way I worded the commit
> message of patch 4 but I have not heard anything back about my
> suggestion and Fangrui commented that --eh-frame-hdr might not be
> necessary but if everything works fine for you with this version, I
> am not inclined to touch it.
> 
> If you feel this is good to go, I am happy to let it go in. Thanks for
> accepting it!

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]