[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200513122613.GA1023594@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:26:13 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Al Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] usb: xhci: Change the XHCI link order in the
Makefile
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:00:15AM -0400, Al Cooper wrote:
> Some BRCMSTB USB chips have an XHCI, EHCI and OHCI controller
> on the same port where XHCI handles 3.0 devices, EHCI handles 2.0
> devices and OHCI handles <2.0 devices. Currently the Makefile
> has XHCI linking at the bottom which will result in the XHIC driver
> initalizing after the EHCI and OHCI drivers and any installed 3.0
> device will be seen as a 2.0 device. Moving the XHCI linking
> above the EHCI and OHCI linking fixes the issue.
What happens if all of these are modules and they are loaded in a
different order? This makefile change will not help with that, you need
to have logic in the code in order to properly coordinate this type of
mess, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists