[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fda05b0-ed3d-7e48-6fab-2309d8a1ad56@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 18:06:36 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathirav@...eaurora.org>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org
Cc: mike.leach@...aro.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: platform: use dev_warn instead of
dev_warn_once
On 5/11/2020 11:01 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 05/11/2020 05:58 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>> Hi Kathiravan,
>>
>> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:58:41PM +0530, Kathiravan T wrote:
>>> When more than one coresight components uses the obsolete DT bindings,
>>> warning is displayed for only one component and not for the others.
>>> Lets warn it for all components by replacing dev_warn_once with
>>> dev_warn.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <kathirav@...eaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>> index 43418a2..b7d9a02 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-platform.c
>>> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static int of_get_coresight_platform_data(struct
>>> device *dev,
>>> if (!parent) {
>>> legacy_binding = true;
>>> parent = node;
>>> - dev_warn_once(dev, "Uses obsolete Coresight DT bindings\n");
>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Uses obsolete Coresight DT bindings\n");
>>
>> We made a concious decision to use dev_warn_once() rather than
>> dev_warn().
>> There can be a lot of coresight devices on a platform and warning for
>> every
>> device doesn't do anything more than adding noise.
>>
>> If one device is using obsolete bindings the others very likely to do
>> so as
>> well. While fixing one device, checking the remaining devices should be
>> intuitive.
>
> Exactly ! Or someone could repeat the process until all are fixed ;-)
>
> Cheers
> Suzuki
Thanks Mathieu and Suzuki for the inputs. I shall drop this patch.
Thanks,
Kathiravan T.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists