linux-kernel - [PATCH V4] staging: vc04_services: Block comment alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200513125405.28242-1-john.oldman@polehill.co.uk>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 13:54:05 +0100
From:   John Oldman <john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk>
To:     nsaenzjulienne@...e.de
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John Oldman <john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH V4] staging: vc04_services: Block comment alignment

Coding style issue reported by checkpatch.pl
This patch clears the checkpatch.pl "Block comments should align
the * on each line" warning.
Also cleared /****** and blank line.

Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk>
---
v1: Initial attempt.
v2: Resubmitted with shorter comment line, as suggested by Greg KH.
v3: Resubmitted with descriptiuon text moved into the comment area.
v4: Resubmitted with /****** and blank lines removed.

 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c     | 33 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c
index 1640906e3929..79b75efa6868 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_connected.c
@@ -14,12 +14,7 @@ static   VCHIQ_CONNECTED_CALLBACK_T g_deferred_callback[MAX_CALLBACKS];
 static   int                        g_once_init;
 static   struct mutex               g_connected_mutex;
 
-/****************************************************************************
-*
-* Function to initialize our lock.
-*
-***************************************************************************/
-
+/* Function to initialize our lock */
 static void connected_init(void)
 {
 	if (!g_once_init) {
@@ -28,15 +23,12 @@ static void connected_init(void)
 	}
 }
 
-/****************************************************************************
-*
-* This function is used to defer initialization until the vchiq stack is
-* initialized. If the stack is already initialized, then the callback will
-* be made immediately, otherwise it will be deferred until
-* vchiq_call_connected_callbacks is called.
-*
-***************************************************************************/
-
+/*
+ * This function is used to defer initialization until the vchiq stack is
+ * initialized. If the stack is already initialized, then the callback will
+ * be made immediately, otherwise it will be deferred until
+ * vchiq_call_connected_callbacks is called.
+ */
 void vchiq_add_connected_callback(VCHIQ_CONNECTED_CALLBACK_T callback)
 {
 	connected_init();
@@ -63,13 +55,10 @@ void vchiq_add_connected_callback(VCHIQ_CONNECTED_CALLBACK_T callback)
 	mutex_unlock(&g_connected_mutex);
 }
 
-/****************************************************************************
-*
-* This function is called by the vchiq stack once it has been connected to
-* the videocore and clients can start to use the stack.
-*
-***************************************************************************/
-
+/*
+ * This function is called by the vchiq stack once it has been connected to
+ * the videocore and clients can start to use the stack.
+ */
 void vchiq_call_connected_callbacks(void)
 {
 	int i;
-- 
2.17.1