lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200513092922.6d79f6ee@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 09:29:22 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [tracing] 06e0a548ba:
 WARNING:at_kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c:#ring_buffer_iter_peek

On Wed, 13 May 2020 11:19:06 +0200
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Did you had a chance to look into this? I can easily reproduce this both on x86
> and s390 by doing:
> 
> cd /sys/kernel/tracing
> cat /dev/zero >/dev/null & # generate some load
> echo function >current_tracer
> # wait a few seconds to fill the buffer
> cat trace
> 
> Usually it will print the warn after a few seconds.
> 
> I haven't digged through all the ring buffer code yet, so i thought i might ask
> whether you have an idea what's going on.

Can you send me the config for where you can reproduce it on x86?

The iterator now doesn't stop the ring buffer when it iterates, and is
doing so over a live buffer (but should be able to handle it). It's
triggering something I thought wasn't suppose to happen (which must be
happening).

Perhaps with your config I'd be able to reproduce it.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ