[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.395.2005132123020.14542@trent.utfs.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
cc: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, shaggy@...nel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lkp@...ts.01.org, Markus.Elfring@....de
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [fs] 05c5a0273b: netperf.Throughput_total_tps
-71.8% regression
On Tue, 12 May 2020, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -71.8% regression of netperf.Throughput_total_tps due to commit:
As noted in this report, netperf is used to "measure various aspect of
networking performance". Are we sure the bisect is correct? JFS is a
filesystem and is not touching net/ in any way. So, having not attempted
to reproduce this, maybe the JFS commit is a red herring?
C.
--
BOFH excuse #50:
Change in Earth's rotational speed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists