lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.395.2005132123020.14542@trent.utfs.org>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 21:27:26 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To:     kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
cc:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>, shaggy@...nel.org,
        jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, Markus.Elfring@....de
Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] [fs] 05c5a0273b: netperf.Throughput_total_tps
 -71.8% regression

On Tue, 12 May 2020, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -71.8% regression of netperf.Throughput_total_tps due to commit:

As noted in this report, netperf is used to "measure various aspect of 
networking performance". Are we sure the bisect is correct? JFS is a 
filesystem and is not touching net/ in any way. So, having not attempted 
to reproduce this, maybe the JFS commit is a red herring?

C.
-- 
BOFH excuse #50:

Change in Earth's rotational speed

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ