[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXNt4A8Gp-24Awgg+PFL2qwa20JKhFiYWbbnV1RefST4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:54:14 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 3 29/29] x86/entry/32: Convert IRET exception to IDTENTRY_SW
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:15 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> Convert the IRET exception handler to IDTENTRY_SW. This is slightly
> different than the conversions of hardware exceptions as the IRET exception
> is invoked via an exception table when IRET faults. So it just uses the
> IDTENTRY_SW mechanism for consistency. It does not emit ASM code as it does
> not fit the other idtentry exceptions.
Blech. I should redo the 32-bit code to handle this the way the
64-bit code does and this can all be deleted. But, for now:
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
However, maybe rename asm_exc_iret_error to avoid confusion? It's not
really an exception entry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists