[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514045724.GH16107@builder.lan>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:57:24 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: ohad@...ery.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, loic.pallardy@...com,
arnaud.pouliquen@...com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] remoteproc: stm32: Request IRQ with platform
device
On Fri 24 Apr 13:24 PDT 2020, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Request IRQ with platform device rather than remote proc in order to
> call stm32_rproc_parse_dt() before rproc_alloc(). That way we can
> know whether we need to synchronise with the MCU or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 91fd59af0ffe..1ac90adba9b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,8 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>
> static irqreturn_t stm32_rproc_wdg(int irq, void *data)
> {
> - struct rproc *rproc = data;
> + struct platform_device *pdev = data;
> + struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> rproc_report_crash(rproc, RPROC_WATCHDOG);
>
> @@ -553,7 +554,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (irq > 0) {
> err = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, stm32_rproc_wdg, 0,
> - dev_name(dev), rproc);
> + dev_name(dev), pdev);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to request wdg irq\n");
> return err;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists