| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <158949186096.215346.4442403798485610696@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:31:00 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
shawn.guo@...aro.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
vincent.knecht@...loo.org, konradybcio@...il.com,
bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8939: Add MSM8939 Generic Clock Controller
Quoting Bryan O'Donoghue (2020-05-12 04:50:23)
> This patch adds support for the MSM8939 GCC. The MSM8939 is based on the
> MSM8916. MSM8939 is compatible in several ways with MSM8916 but, has
> additional functional blocks added which require additional PLL sources. In
> some cases functional blocks from the MSM8916 have different clock sources
> or different supported frequencies.
>
> Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Is this a co-developed-by tag?
> Tested-by: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@...loo.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8939.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8939.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..71081eb23081
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8939.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,3999 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2020 Linaro Limited
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8939.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,gcc-msm8939.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +#include "clk-regmap.h"
> +#include "clk-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-rcg.h"
> +#include "clk-branch.h"
> +#include "reset.h"
> +#include "gdsc.h"
> +
> +enum {
> + P_XO,
> + P_GPLL0,
> + P_GPLL0_AUX,
> + P_BIMC,
> + P_GPLL1,
> + P_GPLL1_AUX,
> + P_GPLL2,
> + P_GPLL2_AUX,
> + P_GPLL3,
> + P_GPLL3_AUX,
> + P_GPLL4,
> + P_GPLL5,
> + P_GPLL5_AUX,
> + P_GPLL5_EARLY,
> + P_GPLL6,
> + P_GPLL6_AUX,
> + P_SLEEP_CLK,
> + P_DSI0_PHYPLL_BYTE,
> + P_DSI0_PHYPLL_DSI,
> + P_EXT_PRI_I2S,
> + P_EXT_SEC_I2S,
> + P_EXT_MCLK,
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_pll gpll0 = {
> + .l_reg = 0x21004,
> + .m_reg = 0x21008,
> + .n_reg = 0x2100c,
> + .config_reg = 0x21010,
> + .mode_reg = 0x21000,
> + .status_reg = 0x2101c,
> + .status_bit = 17,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll0",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
> + .fw_name = "xo",
> + .name = "xo",
Please only have .fw_name. The .name field is a fallback, but given that
this is new code there shouldn't be a need for a fallback to the old way
of doing things.
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_pll_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_regmap gpll0_vote = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x45000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll0_vote",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
> + .hw = &gpll0.clkr.hw,
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_pll_vote_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_pll gpll1 = {
> + .l_reg = 0x20004,
> + .m_reg = 0x20008,
> + .n_reg = 0x2000c,
> + .config_reg = 0x20010,
> + .mode_reg = 0x20000,
> + .status_reg = 0x2001c,
> + .status_bit = 17,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll1",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
> + .fw_name = "xo",
> + .name = "xo",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_pll_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_regmap gpll1_vote = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x45000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(1),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll1_vote",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data) {
> + .hw = &gpll1.clkr.hw,
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_pll_vote_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_pll gpll2 = {
> + .l_reg = 0x4a004,
> + .m_reg = 0x4a008,
> + .n_reg = 0x4a00c,
> + .config_reg = 0x4a010,
> + .mode_reg = 0x4a000,
> + .status_reg = 0x4a01c,
> + .status_bit = 17,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll2",
[...]
> +
> +static int gcc_msm8939_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> +
> + ret = qcom_cc_probe(pdev, &gcc_msm8939_desc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + regmap = dev_get_regmap(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + clk_pll_configure_sr_hpm_lp(&gpll3, regmap, &gpll3_config, true);
> + clk_pll_configure_sr_hpm_lp(&gpll4, regmap, &gpll4_config, true);
We should probably configure these before registering the clks. Can you
do the usual, map registers, configure stuff, and then
qcom_cc_really_probe()?
> +
> + return 0;
And then this can fail so return an error in case it does.
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver gcc_msm8939_driver = {
> + .probe = gcc_msm8939_probe,
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "gcc-msm8939",
> + .of_match_table = gcc_msm8939_match_table,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int __init gcc_msm8939_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&gcc_msm8939_driver);
> +}
> +core_initcall(gcc_msm8939_init);
> +
> +static void __exit gcc_msm8939_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&gcc_msm8939_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(gcc_msm8939_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm GCC MSM8939 Driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:gcc-msm8939");
The module alias isn't needed right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists