lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514051556.GB396285@builder.lan>
Date:   Wed, 13 May 2020 22:15:56 -0700
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     ohad@...ery.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
        alexandre.torgue@...com, loic.pallardy@...com,
        arnaud.pouliquen@...com, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] remoteproc: stm32: Introduce new loaded rsc ops
 for synchronisation

On Fri 24 Apr 13:25 PDT 2020, Mathieu Poirier wrote:

> Introduce new elf find loaded resource table rproc_ops functions to be
> used when synchonising with an MCU.
> 
> Mainly based on the work published by Arnaud Pouliquen [1].
> 
> [1]. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/list/?series=239877
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>

Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>


But I would have preferred if we during probe (when we discover rsc_va)
could just set it on the rproc.

Regards,
Bjorn

> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index b8ae8aed5585..dcae6103e3df 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,15 @@ static int stm32_rproc_sync_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc,
>  	return stm32_rproc_sync_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>  }
>  
> +static struct resource_table *
> +stm32_rproc_sync_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> +					   const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> +	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
> +
> +	return (struct resource_table *)ddata->rsc_va;
> +}
> +
>  static irqreturn_t stm32_rproc_wdg(int irq, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev = data;
> @@ -593,6 +602,7 @@ static __maybe_unused struct rproc_ops st_rproc_sync_ops = {
>  	.start		= stm32_rproc_sync_start,
>  	.stop		= stm32_rproc_stop,
>  	.parse_fw       = stm32_rproc_sync_parse_fw,
> +	.find_loaded_rsc_table = stm32_rproc_sync_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>  };
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id stm32_rproc_match[] = {
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ