[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sgg3z6gx.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 02:49:02 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
"Joel Fernandes\, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 05/36] x86/entry: Flip _TIF_SIGPENDING and _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME handling
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 02:12:21 +0200
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
>> I should have thought about this before, so thanks to both of you for
>> making me look at it again for the very wrong reasons.
>>
>> Consider the patch dropped.
>
> I'm glad our incompetence could be of service to you :-/
Asking incompetent questions is perfectly fine depending on who is
asking them.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists