[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514122735.GW2978@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 14:27:35 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 01:01:04PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > +#if __has_feature(undefined_sanitizer)
>
> Hmm, this might want to be __has_feature(undefined_behavior_sanitizer)
> (and damn is that hard for a Brit to type out!)
(I know right, it should be behaviour, dammit!)
I tried without the condition, eg.:
+#define __no_sanitize_undefined \
+ __attribute__((no_sanitize("undefined")))
and it still generated UBSAN gunk.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists