[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e349e00-817f-6c3e-82db-ce4c1f72bada@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 15:39:43 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] omapfb: get rid of pointless access_ok() calls
On 5/10/20 1:45 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>
> address is passed only to copy_to_user()
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-ioctl.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-ioctl.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-ioctl.c
> index 56995f44e76d..f40be68d5aac 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/omapfb-ioctl.c
> @@ -482,9 +482,6 @@ static int omapfb_memory_read(struct fb_info *fbi,
> if (!display || !display->driver->memory_read)
> return -ENOENT;
>
> - if (!access_ok(mr->buffer, mr->buffer_size))
> - return -EFAULT;
> -
> if (mr->w > 4096 || mr->h > 4096)
> return -EINVAL;
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists