[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=HUj6d9gdZegTGad6thKdHv5b+qOZnkCv5VcWo9AcHifR9uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 11:08:52 +0900
From: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:VIRTIO CORE, NET..."
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>, virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dma-buf: add support for virtio exported objects
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 12:45 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:20 PM David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > This change adds a new dma-buf operation that allows dma-bufs to be used
> > by virtio drivers to share exported objects. The new operation allows
> > the importing driver to query the exporting driver for the UUID which
> > identifies the underlying exported object.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Stevens <stevensd@...omium.org>
>
> Adding Tomasz Figa, I've discussed this with him at elce last year I
> think. Just to make sure.
>
> Bunch of things:
> - obviously we need the users of this in a few drivers, can't really
> review anything stand-alone
Here is a link to the usage of this feature by the currently under
development virtio-video driver:
https://markmail.org/thread/j4xlqaaim266qpks
> - adding very specific ops to the generic interface is rather awkward,
> eventually everyone wants that and we end up in a mess. I think the
> best solution here would be if we create a struct virtio_dma_buf which
> subclasses dma-buf, add a (hopefully safe) runtime upcasting
> functions, and then a virtio_dma_buf_get_uuid() function. Just storing
> the uuid should be doable (assuming this doesn't change during the
> lifetime of the buffer), so no need for a callback.
So you would prefer a solution similar to the original version of this
patchset? https://markmail.org/message/z7if4u56q5fmaok4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists