[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514083143.6400d813@jacob-builder>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:31:43 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Add nested translation helper
function
On Wed, 13 May 2020 22:54:24 -0700
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> > + * 1. CPU vs. IOMMU
> > + * 2. Guest vs. Host.
> > + */
> > + switch (addr_width) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > + case ADDR_WIDTH_5LEVEL:
> > + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57) &&
> > + cap_5lp_support(iommu->cap)) {
> > + pasid_set_flpm(pte, 1);
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "5-level paging
> > not supported\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + break;
>
> The normal style would be to handle the early error return first:
>
> if (!cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_LA57) ||
> !cap_5lp_support(iommu->cap)) {
> dev_err_ratelimited(dev,
> "5-level paging not supported\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> pasid_set_flpm(pte, 1);
> break;
>
Sounds good. I was thinking in positive logic.
thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists