[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <893fb221-1ec9-7fc0-c25d-299c0222c52a@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:29:46 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/resctrl: Misc cleanup
Hi James,
On 4/30/2020 10:03 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Hello!
>
> These are the miscellaneous cleanup patches that floated to the top of
> the MPAM tree.
>
> The only interesting thing are the patches to make the AMD/Intel
> differences something resctrl understands, instead of just 'happening'
> because of the different function pointers.
> This will become more important once MPAM support is added. parse_bw()
> and friends are what enforces resctrl's ABI resctrl. Allowing an
> architecture/platform to provide a subtly different function here would
> be bad for user-space.
>
> MPAM would set arch_has_sparse_bitmaps, but not arch_needs_linear.
>
> Since [v1], I've picked up all the review feedback and collected the
> tags.
>
> Nothing in this series should change any behaviour.
> This series is based on v5.7-rc3.
Please note that there are currently some resctrl changes in branch
x86/cache of the tip repo that are queued for inclusion into v5.8 that
have a few conflicts with this series. When you resubmit it may be
helpful if this series is based on that instead.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists