[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200514155111.GO2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 08:51:11 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] rcu: Nocb (de)activate through sysfs
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 01:23:13AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:42:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:47:14PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > Not for merge.
> > >
> > > Make nocb toggable for a given CPU using:
> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/hotplug/nocb
> > >
> > > This is only intended for those who want to test this patchset. The real
> > > interfaces will be cpuset/isolation and rcutorture.
> >
> > Makes sense!
> >
> > Speaking of rcutorture, what level of testing has this series undergone?
>
> None yet, that first set was to shape up the design. But next
> iteration should see rcutorture coverage.
Fair enough! I am sure that rcutorture will be ready when you are.
Hey, it always has been ready for me! ;-)
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists