[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1278452779.21179.1589472210183.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 12:03:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Joel Fernandes, Google" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 1 29/36] x86/mce: Send #MC singal from task work
----- On May 14, 2020, at 10:17 AM, Borislav Petkov bp@...en8.de wrote:
> + Tony.
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:16:31PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>>
>> Convert #MC over to using task_work_add(); it will run the same code
>> slightly later, on the return to user path of the same exception.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> I like this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
What I am not fully grasping here is whether this patch preserves the instruction
pointer (and possibly other relevant information for siginfo_t) triggering the
exception in a scenario where we have:
- #MC triggered, queuing task work,
- unrelated signal happens to be delivered to task,
- exit to usermode loop handles do_signal first,
- then it runs task work.
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists