lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 03:22:36 +0300 From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Nathaniel McCallum <npmccallum@...hat.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave.hansen@...el.com, "Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>, "Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, "Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@...el.com>, bp@...en8.de, Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, luto@...nel.org, kai.huang@...el.com, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>, Patrick Uiterwijk <puiterwijk@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v29 00/20] Intel SGX foundations On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 21:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> writes: > > General question: maybe it would be easiest that I issue a pull request > > once everyone feels that the series is ready to be pulled and stop sending > > new versions of the series? > > Might be the easiest for you, but I prefer a final series in email. > > Thanks, > > tglx For me both are just as easy or as hard :-) Just wanted to query the preference. /Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists