[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515191419.GQ5066@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 20:14:19 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] spi: dw: Clear DMAC register when done or stopped
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:23:22PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:12:19PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Unless someone explicitly gives you a tag for something you shouldn't
> > usually assume that one applies, especially with maintainers giving acks
> > on their own trees since that has process meaning - it's saying that the
> > maintainer is OK with it being applied to some other tree which is
> > something it's worth being careful about.
> Hm, it depends on maintainer and sub-system then. I did such "looks good" ->
> Acked-by conversions before. Not that many, but noone argued. [1] also says it's
> sometimes possible. Anyway, sorry for inconvenience. I'll get to remember that
> I'd better ask explicit acked-by from you, no assumption.
Like I say it's much more important when it's a patch that someone would
normally apply themselves since it makes a much bigger difference
process wise if you ack or apply a patch.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists