lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4683046a-c6b5-30a5-ef02-2f610523ae1c@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 15:08:59 -0600
From:   Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, wufan@...eaurora.org,
        pratanan@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] qaic: Create char dev

On 5/14/2020 10:24 AM, Jeffrey Hugo wrote:
> On 5/14/2020 9:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> Please use misc.
> 
> Ok, will investigate.
> 

Misc looks like it'll work, and I'm expecting to have that in the next 
revision.  However, a few of us looked at misc vs chardev, and didn't 
see much of a difference.

We were hoping you'd be kind enough to educate us on the considerations 
between the two, in-case we missed something that ends up being very 
relevant.  We attempted to find relevant documentation within the 
kernel, and in Linux Device Drivers 3rd edition, but did not find any 
besides just reading the misc dev code.  If we missed something, please 
point us to it.

By going with a misc device, we see two possible limitations -

1. You don't have your own major number, so userspace may have to do a 
bit more work to identify your device.  However, given that the driver 
assigns the device name, one would think that the device name would be 
pretty unique.  So, it seems like this would have a minor impact to udev 
rules.

2. There are a limited number of dynamic minor numbers for misc devs 
(64), so if you are expecting more devices than that, a misc dev is not 
appropiate.  Also, these minors are shared with other misc dev users, so 
depending on the system configuration, you might have significantly less 
than 64 minors available for use.

-- 
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ