[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515041456.GD16070@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:14:56 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] mm/swap: use npage_to_sectors() and
PAGE_SECTORS to clean up code
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:50:56PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> +++ b/mm/page_io.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static struct bio *get_swap_bio(gfp_t gfp_flags,
>
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = map_swap_page(page, &bdev);
> bio_set_dev(bio, bdev);
> - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector <<= PAGE_SHIFT - 9;
> + bio->bi_iter.bi_sector *= PAGE_SECTORS;
> bio->bi_end_io = end_io;
This just doesn't look right. Why is map_swap_page() returning a sector_t
which isn't actually a sector_t?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists