[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200515083325.378539-5-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:33:10 +0200
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jérôme Pouiller
<jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/19] staging: wfx: fix value of scan timeout
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Before to start the scan request, the firmware signals (with a null
frame) to the AP it won't be able to receive data. This frame can be
long to send: up to 512TU. The current calculus of the scan timeout does
not take into account this delay.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
index 1cb71f0ad804..893b67f2f792 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ int hif_scan(struct wfx_vif *wvif, struct cfg80211_scan_request *req,
tmo_chan_bg = le32_to_cpu(body->max_channel_time) * USEC_PER_TU;
tmo_chan_fg = 512 * USEC_PER_TU + body->probe_delay;
tmo_chan_fg *= body->num_of_probe_requests;
- tmo = chan_num * max(tmo_chan_bg, tmo_chan_fg);
+ tmo = chan_num * max(tmo_chan_bg, tmo_chan_fg) + 512 * USEC_PER_TU;
wfx_fill_header(hif, wvif->id, HIF_REQ_ID_START_SCAN, buf_len);
ret = wfx_cmd_send(wvif->wdev, hif, NULL, 0, false);
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists