[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515083814.GE69177@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 16:38:14 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: adjust vm_committed_as_batch according to vm
overcommit policy
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:44:43PM +0800, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 08-05-20 15:25:17, Feng Tang wrote:
> > When checking a performance change for will-it-scale scalability
> > mmap test [1], we found very high lock contention for spinlock of
> > percpu counter 'vm_committed_as':
>
> Btw. you are focusing on a microbenchmark here but I believe that there
> are non-synthetic worklaods which would benefit from a larger batch.
> E.g. large in memory databases which do large mmaps during startups
> from multiple threads.
I imagined cases like this too :) but was not sure there are such cases.
So I only put down the the benchmark I've worked with in 0day.
Thanks,
Feng
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists