| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 18:31:52 +0800
From: dillon min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, thierry.reding@...il.com,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] clk: stm32: Fix stm32f429 ltdc driver loading hang
in clk set rate. keep ltdc clk running after kernel startup
Hi Stephen,
thanks for reviewing.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 5:02 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting dillon.minfei@...il.com (2020-05-12 00:03:36)
> > From: dillon min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> >
> > as store stm32f4_rcc_register_pll return to the wrong offset of clks,
>
> Use () on functions, i.e. stm32f4_rcc_register_pll().
ok
>
> > so ltdc gate clk is null. need change clks[PLL_VCO_SAI] to clks[PLL_SAI]
>
> And quote variables like 'clks[PLL_VCO_SAI]'
ok
>
> >
> > add CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED for ltdc to make sure clk not be freed by
> > clk_disable_unused
>
> clk_disable_unused() doesn't free anything. Why does ltdc not need to be
> turned off if it isn't used? Is it critical to system operation? Should
> it be marked with the critical clk flag then? The CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag
> is almost always wrong to use.
Yes, you are right. thanks. CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED just hide the root
cause. after deeper debugging.
i need to drop the last changes , they are not the root cause.
post diff and analyse here first, i will resubmit clk's changes in
next patchset with gyro and ili9341.
--- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
@@ -129,8 +129,6 @@ static const struct stm32f4_gate_data
stm32f429_gates[] __initconst = {
{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 20, "spi5", "apb2_div" },
{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21, "spi6", "apb2_div" },
{ STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22, "sai1", "apb2_div" },
- { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div",
- CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
};
static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[] __initconst = {
@@ -558,13 +556,13 @@ static const struct clk_div_table post_divr_table[] = {
#define MAX_POST_DIV 3
static const struct stm32f4_pll_post_div_data post_div_data[MAX_POST_DIV] = {
- { CLK_I2SQ_PDIV, PLL_I2S, "plli2s-q-div", "plli2s-q",
+ { CLK_I2SQ_PDIV, PLL_VCO_I2S, "plli2s-q-div", "plli2s-q",
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 0, 5, 0, NULL},
- { CLK_SAIQ_PDIV, PLL_SAI, "pllsai-q-div", "pllsai-q",
+ { CLK_SAIQ_PDIV, PLL_VCO_SAI, "pllsai-q-div", "pllsai-q",
CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 8, 5, 0, NULL },
- { NO_IDX, PLL_SAI, "pllsai-r-div", "pllsai-r", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
+ { NO_IDX, PLL_VCO_SAI, "pllsai-r-div", "pllsai-r", CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 16, 2, 0, post_divr_table },
};
@@ -1758,7 +1756,7 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct
device_node *np)
clks[PLL_VCO_I2S] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
&data->pll_data[1], &stm32f4_clk_lock);
- clks[PLL_SAI] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
+ clks[PLL_VCO_SAI] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
&data->pll_data[2], &stm32f4_clk_lock);
for (n = 0; n < MAX_POST_DIV; n++) {
issue 1: ili9341 hang in clk set rate, the root cause should be
PLL_VCO_SAI, PLL_SAI mismatch
for 'clks[]'
1, first at stm32f4_rcc_init() ,
clks[PLL_VCO_SAI] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
&data->pll_data[2], &stm32f4_clk_lock);
the clk_hw from stm32f4_rcc_register_pll() is store to 'clks[7]', defined in
'include/dt-bindings/clock/stm32fx-clock.h'
2, next
hw = clk_register_pll_div(post_div->name,
post_div->parent,
post_div->flag,
base + post_div->offset,
post_div->shift,
post_div->width,
post_div->flag_div,
post_div->div_table,
clks[post_div->pll_num],
&stm32f4_clk_lock);
the 'clks[post_div->pll_num]', the pll_num is PLL_SAI, the value is 2,
defined at
enum {
PLL,
PLL_I2S,
PLL_SAI,
};
'post_div_data[]'
so 7 != 2 offset of 'clks[]', input the wrong 'clks[]' to
clk_register_pll_div. cause to_clk_gate result is null,
crashed in ltdc driver's loading.
issue 2: clk_disable_unused() turn off ltdc clock.
1, ltdc clk is defined in 'stm32f429_gates[]', register to clk core,
but there is no user to use it.
ltdc driver use dts binding name "lcd", connect to CLK_LCD, then
aux clk 'lcd-tft '
2, as no one use 'stm32f429_gates[]' s ltdc clock , so the
enable_count is zero, after kernel startup
it's been turn off by clk_disable_unused() is fine.
my chages for this is remove the ltdc from 'stm32f429_gates[]'
but this modification still need 'clk-stm32f4.c''s maintainer to check
if there is side effect.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: dillon min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 5 +++--
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> > index 18117ce..0ba73de 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
> > @@ -129,7 +129,8 @@ static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f429_gates[] __initconst = {
> > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 20, "spi5", "apb2_div" },
> > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21, "spi6", "apb2_div" },
> > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22, "sai1", "apb2_div" },
> > - { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div" },
> > + { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div",
> > + CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED },
> > };
> >
> > static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[] __initconst = {
> > @@ -1757,7 +1758,7 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct device_node *np)
> > clks[PLL_VCO_I2S] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
> > &data->pll_data[1], &stm32f4_clk_lock);
> >
> > - clks[PLL_VCO_SAI] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
> > + clks[PLL_SAI] = stm32f4_rcc_register_pll("vco_in",
> > &data->pll_data[2], &stm32f4_clk_lock);
> >
> > for (n = 0; n < MAX_POST_DIV; n++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists