[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1589505358.3197.101.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 09:15:58 +0800
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
<avri.altman@....com>, <chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com>,
<kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<peter.wang@...iatek.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <andy.teng@...iatek.com>,
<bvanassche@....org>, <cang@...eaurora.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] scsi: ufs: allow customizable WriteBooster flush
policy
Hi Martin,
On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 21:10 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2020 17:37:12 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote:
>
> > This patch set tries to allow vendors to modify the WriteBooster flush policy.
> >
> > In the same time, collect all customizable parameters to an unified structure to make UFS driver more clean.
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - Squash patch [3] and [4]
> > - Remove a dummy "new line" in patch [3]
> > - Fix commit message in patch [3]
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to 5.8/scsi-queue, thanks!
>
> I had to combine patches 1 and 2. Otherwise you'd get compile
> failures due to the fields moving inside the struct.
>
> [1/4] scsi: ufs: Introduce ufs_hba_variant_params to group customizable parameters
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/90b8491c0033
> [3/4] scsi: ufs: Customize flush threshold for WriteBooster
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/d14734ae3ae7
> [4/4] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Customize WriteBooster flush policy
> https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/f48b285ae658
>
Thanks so much for helping the patch squash.
Thanks,
Stanley Chu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists