[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515130313.GI8135@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:03:13 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] mm: Get rid of vmalloc_sync_(un)mappings()
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 09:01:04AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I would love to see a followup patch that preallocates the vmalloc
> region on 64-bit and compiles out pgd_list and all of the associated
> gunk.
Looked a bit into this, with pre-allocation and a few more changes all
but one users of pgd_list and pgd_lock can be get rid of on x86-64. But
there is the XEN-PV code which also needs to traverse pgd_list, and I am
not sure how to get rid of that.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists