[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKeNEdpY77xCWvPg-i4vQBoKLX3Y96gvf1kL7Pe29rmq_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:04:02 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Petr Vorel <pvorel@...e.cz>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Setting mount propagation type in new mount API
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 1:40 PM Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
<mtk.manpages@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hello David, Miklos,
>
> I've been looking at the new mount API (fsopen(), fsconfig(),
> fsmount(), move_mount(), etc.) and among the details that remain
> mysterious to me is this: how does one set the propagation type
> (private/shared/slave/unbindable) of a new mount and change the
> propagation type of an existing mount?
Existing mount can be chaged with mount(NULL, path, NULL, MS_$(propflag), NULL).
To do that with a detached mount created by fsmount(2) the
"/proc/self/fd/$fd" trick can be used.
The plan was to introduce a mount_setattr(2) syscall, but that hasn't
happened yet... I'm not sure we should be adding propagation flags to
fsmount(2), since that is a less generic mechanism than
mount_setattr(2) or just plain mount(2) as shown above.
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists