linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Backport security fixe to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200515132943.GA97579@csiddharth-a01.vmware.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 18:59:43 +0530
From:   Siddharth Chandrasekaran <siddharth@...edjournal.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Siddharth Chandrasekaran <csiddharth@...are.com>,
        srostedt@...are.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...nel.org, srivatsab@...are.com, dchinner@...hat.com,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Backport security fixe to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:57:01PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 06:19:45PM +0530, Siddharth Chandrasekaran wrote:
> > Please ignore this patch set, I accidentally added another patch I was
> > working on. Will send v2 with the right patches.
> 
> What patch set?  I see nothing in this email, so I have no idea what you
> are referring to :(

Apologies! Looks like my email thread was broken. I was referring to
the thread here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/14/1326 with subject:
  
  "[PATCH] Backport security fixe to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees"

The corrected version (v2) of this patch should have reached you
(hopefully) with the subject:

  "[PATCH v2] Backport xfs security fix to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees"

Thanks!

-- Sid.