linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Backport security fixe to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200515095216.79fccd40@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 09:52:16 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Siddharth Chandrasekaran <siddharth@...edjournal.com>,
        Siddharth Chandrasekaran <csiddharth@...are.com>,
        srostedt@...are.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...nel.org, srivatsab@...are.com, dchinner@...hat.com,
        darrick.wong@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Backport security fixe to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees

On Fri, 15 May 2020 15:40:09 +0200
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:

> > 
> >   "[PATCH v2] Backport xfs security fix to 4.9 and 4.4 stable trees"  
> 
> Sorry, I see no such email in my staging patch queue.
> 
> Do you have a link to the series on lore.kernel.org?  lkml.org is a mess
> and not under our control.

That's because it Cc'd stable@...nel.org and not stable@...r.kernel.org.

Should Siddharth resend?

-- Steve