linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] spi: dw: Use DMA max burst to set the request thresholds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200515143842.GG1634618@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 May 2020 17:38:42 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        Gareth Williams <gareth.williams.jx@...esas.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Georgy Vlasov <Georgy.Vlasov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Ramil Zaripov <Ramil.Zaripov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Wan Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@...el.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Clement Leger <cleger@...ray.eu>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] spi: dw: Use DMA max burst to set the request
 thresholds

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 01:47:49PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Each channel of DMA controller may have a limited length of burst
> transaction (number of IO operations performed at ones in a single
> DMA client request). This parameter can be used to setup the most
> optimal DMA Tx/Rx data level values. In order to avoid the Tx buffer
> overrun we can set the DMA Tx level to be of FIFO depth minus the
> maximum burst transactions length. To prevent the Rx buffer underflow
> the DMA Rx level should be set to the maximum burst transactions length.
> This commit setups the DMA channels and the DW SPI DMA Tx/Rx levels
> in accordance with these rules.

It's good one, but see my comments.


I think this patch should go before previous one.
(and without changes regarding FIFO length)

> +static void mid_spi_maxburst_init(struct dw_spi *dws)
> +{
> +	struct dma_slave_caps caps;
> +	u32 max_burst, def_burst;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	def_burst = dws->fifo_len / 2;
> +
> +	ret = dma_get_slave_caps(dws->rxchan, &caps);
> +	if (!ret && caps.max_burst)
> +		max_burst = caps.max_burst;
> +	else
> +		max_burst = RX_BURST_LEVEL;
> +

> +	dws->rxburst = (def_burst > max_burst) ? max_burst : def_burst;

min() ?

> +
> +	ret = dma_get_slave_caps(dws->txchan, &caps);
> +	if (!ret && caps.max_burst)
> +		max_burst = caps.max_burst;
> +	else
> +		max_burst = TX_BURST_LEVEL;
> +

> +	dws->txburst = (def_burst > max_burst) ? max_burst : def_burst;

Ditto.

> +}
> +
>  static int mid_spi_dma_init_mfld(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
>  {
>  	struct dw_dma_slave slave = {0};
> @@ -67,6 +92,8 @@ static int mid_spi_dma_init_mfld(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
>  	dws->master->dma_rx = dws->rxchan;
>  	dws->master->dma_tx = dws->txchan;
>  
> +	mid_spi_maxburst_init(dws);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  free_rxchan:
> @@ -92,6 +119,8 @@ static int mid_spi_dma_init_generic(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
>  	dws->master->dma_rx = dws->rxchan;
>  	dws->master->dma_tx = dws->txchan;
>  
> +	mid_spi_maxburst_init(dws);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -195,7 +224,7 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dw_spi_dma_prepare_tx(struct dw_spi *dws,
>  	memset(&txconf, 0, sizeof(txconf));
>  	txconf.direction = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
>  	txconf.dst_addr = dws->dma_addr;
> -	txconf.dst_maxburst = TX_BURST_LEVEL;
> +	txconf.dst_maxburst = dws->txburst;
>  	txconf.src_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
>  	txconf.dst_addr_width = convert_dma_width(dws->n_bytes);
>  	txconf.device_fc = false;
> @@ -268,7 +297,7 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dw_spi_dma_prepare_rx(struct dw_spi *dws,
>  	memset(&rxconf, 0, sizeof(rxconf));
>  	rxconf.direction = DMA_DEV_TO_MEM;
>  	rxconf.src_addr = dws->dma_addr;
> -	rxconf.src_maxburst = RX_BURST_LEVEL;
> +	rxconf.src_maxburst = dws->rxburst;
>  	rxconf.dst_addr_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES;
>  	rxconf.src_addr_width = convert_dma_width(dws->n_bytes);
>  	rxconf.device_fc = false;
> @@ -293,8 +322,8 @@ static int mid_spi_dma_setup(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_transfer *xfer)
>  {
>  	u16 imr = 0, dma_ctrl = 0;
>  
> -	dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_DMARDLR, RX_BURST_LEVEL - 1);
> -	dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_DMATDLR, dws->fifo_len - TX_BURST_LEVEL);
> +	dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_DMARDLR, dws->rxburst - 1);
> +	dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_DMATDLR, dws->fifo_len - dws->txburst);
>  
>  	if (xfer->tx_buf) {
>  		dma_ctrl |= SPI_DMA_TDMAE;

...

>  	/* DMA info */
>  	struct dma_chan		*txchan;
> +	u32			txburst;
>  	struct dma_chan		*rxchan;
> +	u32			rxburst;

Leave u32 together, it may be optimal on 64-bit architectures where ABIs require padding.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko