[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d075dyz3.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 17:01:04 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 part 4 23/24] x86/entry: Provide IDTENTRY_DF
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> writes:
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:16 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> Provide a separate macro for #DF as this needs to emit paranoid only code
>> and has also a special ASM stub in 32bit.
>
> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>
> but... maybe it would be cleaner just to open-code all of this in the
> next patch? This is a lot of macro to do nothing at all.
Well, yes and no. The point is that we really want to have all idt
entries marked IDENTRY_ and have the prototypes including the XEN
variants generated.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists