[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200515150530.GG2869@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 08:05:30 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's
README into top-level one
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:01:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On Thu, 14 May 2020 15:45:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:03:33AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> On Thu, 14 May 2020 10:16:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:46:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:39:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >>>>> From 96fa6680e3b990633ecbb6d11acf03a161b790bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
> >>>>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:12:57 +0900
> >>>>> Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Where Documentation/litmus-tests/README lists RCU litmus tests,
> >>>>> Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README lists atomic litmus tests.
> >>>>> For symmetry, merge the latter into former, with some context
> >>>>> adjustment in the introduction.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
> >>>>> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>
> >>> Applied, and thank you all!
> >>>
> >>> I rebased, cancelling the revert with the original, resulting in an
> >>> updated lkmm branch on -rcu. There was one minor conflict, so could
> >>> one of you please check to make sure that I resolved things appropriately?
> >>
> >> One thing I noticed.
> >>
> >> Commit b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU
> >> pre-initialization test")'s change log says:
> >>
> >> Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is
> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README.
> >>
> >> Because of the rebase, this needs amendment as well as the title.
> >>
> >> Something like
> >>
> >> Documentation/litumus-tests: Cite a relevant litmus test in tools/memory-model
> >>
> >> For ease of finding the RCU related litmus test under
> >> tools/memory-model/, add an entry in README.
> >>
> >> ?
> >
> > Good catch, and yes, I will update that on the next rebase.
> >
> > Any other things in need of adjustment?
>
> Aside from the missing Signed-off-by tags Stephen pointed out, I don't
> see anything.
Yeah, I did mess that up! ;-)
Thank you for checking!!!
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists