[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34fa4c00-9860-ca09-da4d-c5b20aad81b7@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 10:05:02 +0800
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
"Sergey Senozhatsky" <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
"Alasdair Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] clean up SECTOR related macros and sectors/pages
conversions
Hi, all:
It seems no one take care about these patches. But I think patch 1 is need. And
the main discussion points of others is whether we should add
sectors_to_npage()/npage_to_sectors() or keep PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT. And which marco
name do we prefer: PAGE_SECTORS vs SECTORS_PER_PAGE, PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT vs
SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT.
Hi, Jens Axboe, Coly Li, Kent Overstreet,Alasdair Kergon. Mike Snitzer:
Can you take a look at patch 1?
On 2020/5/7 15:50, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v1 --> v2:
> As Matthew Wilcox's suggestion, add sectors_to_npage()/npage_to_sectors()
> helpers to eliminate SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT, because it's quite hard to read.
> In further, I also eliminated PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT.
>
> I tried to eliminate all magic number "9" and "512", but it's too many, maybe
> no one want to review it, so I gave up. In the process of searching, I found
> the existing macro PAGE_SECTORS, it's equivalent to SECTORS_PER_PAGE. Because
> PAGE_SECTORS was defined in include/linux/device-mapper.h, and SECTORS_PER_PAGE
> was defined in drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h, so I discarded SECTORS_PER_PAGE,
> althrough I prefer it so much.
>
> v1:
> When I studied the code of mm/swap, I found "1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9)" appears
> many times. So I try to clean up it.
>
> 1. Replace "1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9)" or similar with SECTORS_PER_PAGE
> 2. Replace "PAGE_SHIFT - 9" with SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT
> 3. Replace "9" with SECTOR_SHIFT
> 4. Replace "512" with SECTOR_SIZE
>
> Zhen Lei (10):
> block: move PAGE_SECTORS definition into <linux/blkdev.h>
> zram: abolish macro SECTORS_PER_PAGE
> block: add sectors_to_npage()/npage_to_sectors() helpers
> zram: abolish macro SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT
> block: abolish macro PAGE_SECTORS_SHIFT
> mm/swap: use npage_to_sectors() and PAGE_SECTORS to clean up code
> block: use sectors_to_npage() and PAGE_SECTORS to clean up code
> md: use sectors_to_npage() and npage_to_sectors() to clean up code
> md: use existing definition RESYNC_SECTORS
> md: use PAGE_SECTORS to clean up code
>
> block/blk-settings.c | 6 +++---
> block/partitions/core.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/block/brd.c | 7 ++-----
> drivers/block/null_blk_main.c | 10 ++++------
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 2 --
> drivers/md/bcache/util.h | 2 --
> drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/md-bitmap.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> drivers/md/md.c | 6 +++---
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 11 +++++------
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 4 ++--
> include/linux/blkdev.h | 7 +++++--
> include/linux/device-mapper.h | 1 -
> mm/page_io.c | 4 ++--
> mm/swapfile.c | 12 ++++++------
> 19 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists