[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6201773F57F2F41B77B926808DBA0@DM6PR04MB6201.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 12:53:03 +0000
From: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Improve boot prints for multiple
PLIC instances
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Sent: 16 May 2020 17:50
> To: Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>
> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>; Paul Walmsley
> <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>; Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>; Jason
> Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>; Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>; Alistair
> Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>; Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>; linux-
> riscv@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] irqchip/sifive-plic: Improve boot prints for multiple
> PLIC instances
>
> On 2020-05-16 07:38, Anup Patel wrote:
> > We improve PLIC banner to help distinguish multiple PLIC instances in
> > boot time prints.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 11 +++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > index 7dc23edb3267..2d3db927a551 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > @@ -284,6 +284,11 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node
> > *node,
> > u32 nr_irqs;
> > struct plic_priv *priv;
> > struct plic_handler *handler;
> > + struct resource iores;
> > +
> > + error = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &iores);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> >
> > priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!priv)
> > @@ -377,8 +382,10 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node
> > *node,
> > plic_cpuhp_setup_done = true;
> > }
> >
> > - pr_info("mapped %d interrupts with %d handlers for %d contexts.\n",
> > - nr_irqs, nr_handlers, nr_contexts);
> > + pr_info("interrupt-controller at 0x%llx "
> > + "(interrupts=%d, contexts=%d, handlers=%d)\n",
> > + (unsigned long long)iores.start, nr_irqs,
> > + nr_contexts, nr_handlers);
>
> Instead of displaying "interrupt controller at ...", why not use the existing printk
> format for OF nodes? Something along the lines of
>
> pr_info("%pOF : mapped %d interrupts with %d handlers for %d contexts\n",
> node, nr_irqs, nr_handlers, nr_contexts);
Sure, I will go with your suggestion and use printk for OF nodes.
Regards,
Anup
Powered by blists - more mailing lists