linux-kernel - [PATCH v12 08/11] mmu: spp: Re-enable SPP protection when EPT mapping changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200516125507.5277-9-weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 May 2020 20:55:04 +0800
From:   Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc:     yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com, alazar@...defender.com,
        edwin.zhai@...el.com, ssicleru@...defender.com,
        Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v12 08/11] mmu: spp: Re-enable SPP protection when EPT mapping changes

Host page swapping/migration may change the translation in
EPT leaf entry, if the target page is SPP protected,
re-enable SPP protection. When SPPT mmu-page is reclaimed,
no need to clear rmap as no memory-mapping is in SPPT L4E.

Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 9d5a0eb3d24e..1cf25752e37c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1796,6 +1796,19 @@ static int kvm_set_pte_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
 			new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
 			new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
 
+			/*
+			 * if it's EPT leaf entry and the physical page is
+			 * SPP protected, then re-enable SPP protection for
+			 * the page.
+			 */
+			if (kvm->arch.spp_active &&
+			    level == PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
+				u32 *access = gfn_to_subpage_wp_info(slot, gfn);
+
+				if (access && *access != FULL_SPP_ACCESS)
+					new_spte |= PT_SPP_MASK;
+			}
+
 			new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(new_spte);
 
 			mmu_spte_clear_track_bits(sptep);
@@ -2639,6 +2652,10 @@ static bool mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	pte = *spte;
 	if (is_shadow_present_pte(pte)) {
 		if (is_last_spte(pte, sp->role.level)) {
+			/* SPPT leaf entries don't have rmaps*/
+			if (sp->role.spp && sp->role.level ==
+			    PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL)
+				return true;
 			drop_spte(kvm, spte);
 			if (is_large_pte(pte))
 				--kvm->stat.lpages;
-- 
2.17.2