[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7723588-3df8-10f4-45a3-2e061cd06dc2@micronovasrl.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 19:28:09 +0200
From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, matwey.kornilov@...il.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lukas@...ner.de, christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] serial: 8250: Handle implementations not having
TEMT interrupt using em485
Hi Heiko,
Il 17/05/2020 17:04, Heiko Stübner ha scritto:
> Hi Giulio,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2020, 03:02:39 CEST schrieb Giulio Benetti:
>> Il 26/03/2020 01:05, Heiko Stübner ha scritto:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2020, 00:47:38 CET schrieb Giulio Benetti:
>>>> very cleaner way to handle TEMT as a capability!
>>>> And I've found one thing...
>>>>
>>>> Il 26/03/2020 00:14, Heiko Stuebner ha scritto:
>>>>> From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Some 8250 ports have a TEMT interrupt but it's not a part of the 8250
>>>>> standard, instead only available on some implementations.
>>>>>
>>>>> The current em485 implementation does not work on ports without it.
>>>>> The only chance to make it work is to loop-read on LSR register.
>>>>>
>>>>> So add UART_CAP_TEMT to mark 8250 uarts having this interrupt,
>>>>> update all current em485 users with that capability and make
>>>>> the stop_tx function loop-read on uarts not having it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
>>>>> [moved to use added UART_CAP_TEMT, use readx_poll_timeout]
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c | 2 ++
>>>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c | 2 +-
>>>>> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
>>>>> index 52bb21205bb6..770eb00db497 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h
>>>>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ struct serial8250_config {
>>>>> #define UART_CAP_MINI (1 << 17) /* Mini UART on BCM283X family lacks:
>>>>> * STOP PARITY EPAR SPAR WLEN5 WLEN6
>>>>> */
>>>>> +#define UART_CAP_TEMT (1 << 18) /* UART has TEMT interrupt */
>>>>>
>>>>> #define UART_BUG_QUOT (1 << 0) /* UART has buggy quot LSB */
>>>>> #define UART_BUG_TXEN (1 << 1) /* UART has buggy TX IIR status */
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>>>>> index 12d03e678295..3881242424ca 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c
>>>>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int bcm2835aux_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>
>>>>> /* initialize data */
>>>>> - up.capabilities = UART_CAP_FIFO | UART_CAP_MINI;
>>>>> + up.capabilities = UART_CAP_FIFO | UART_CAP_MINI | UART_CAP_TEMT;
>>>>> up.port.dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>>> up.port.regshift = 2;
>>>>> up.port.type = PORT_16550;
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
>>>>> index 65e9045dafe6..841f6fcb2878 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c
>>>>> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ static int of_platform_serial_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
>>>>> &port8250.overrun_backoff_time_ms) != 0)
>>>>> port8250.overrun_backoff_time_ms = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> + port8250.capabilities |= UART_CAP_TEMT;
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't this be NOT UART_CAP_TEMT set by default? On all other
>>>> vendor specific files you enable it, I think here you shouldn't enable
>>>> it too by default. Right?
>>>
>>> 8250_of does use the em485 emulation - see of_platform_serial_setup()
>>> So I did go by the lazy assumption that any 8250 driver using rs485
>>> before my series always used the interrupt driver code path, so
>>> implicitly required to have the TEMT interrupt.
>>>
>>> Of course, you're right that with the 8250_of maybe not all variants
>>> actually do have this interrupt, so falling back to the polling here might
>>> be safer.
>>
>> Probably here it's worth introducing a dt boolean property like
>> "temt-capability", then you set or not UART_CAP_TEMT according to its
>> presence in dts. This way all cases are covered and we can act
>> completely through dts files.
>>
>> What about that?
>
> Sorry that this was sitting around for over a month.
np at all
> I think there are two problems with this:
>
> (1) this would break backwards compatibility ... right now the whole code
> just assumes that everyone does support the TEMT interrupt, so adding
> a property to keep it working would break old DTs, which is something that
> should not happen ... I guess one option would be to use the inverse
> no-temt-interrupt
>
> (2) uarts handled by 8250_of are still identified by their compatible
> though and there is no generic 8250-of compatible, so the
> presence / absence of the temt capability should actually just be
> bound to the relevant compatible.
>
>
> So my "gut feeling" is to just keep the current way
> (was expecting temt-capability before anyway) until an uart
> variant without temt comes along
I agree with you, what I was proposing is another thing more to do an
can be done when needed.
Best regards
--
Giulio Benetti
CTO
MICRONOVA SRL
Sede: Via A. Niedda 3 - 35010 Vigonza (PD)
Tel. 049/8931563 - Fax 049/8931346
Cod.Fiscale - P.IVA 02663420285
Capitale Sociale € 26.000 i.v.
Iscritta al Reg. Imprese di Padova N. 02663420285
Numero R.E.A. 258642
Powered by blists - more mailing lists