linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 56/90] netfilter: conntrack: avoid gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200518173502.512499313@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 19:36:34 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 56/90] netfilter: conntrack: avoid gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warning

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

[ Upstream commit 2c407aca64977ede9b9f35158e919773cae2082f ]

gcc-10 warns around a suspicious access to an empty struct member:

net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c: In function '__nf_conntrack_alloc':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1522:9: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[0]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds]
 1522 |  memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0,
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:37:
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:90:5: note: while referencing '__nfct_init_offset'
   90 |  u8 __nfct_init_offset[0];
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The code is correct but a bit unusual. Rework it slightly in a way that
does not trigger the warning, using an empty struct instead of an empty
array. There are probably more elegant ways to do this, but this is the
smallest change.

Fixes: c41884ce0562 ("netfilter: conntrack: avoid zeroing timer")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 2 +-
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c    | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
index b57a9f37c297b..7befec513295d 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ struct nf_conn {
 	struct hlist_node	nat_bysource;
 #endif
 	/* all members below initialized via memset */
-	u8 __nfct_init_offset[0];
+	struct { } __nfct_init_offset;
 
 	/* If we were expected by an expectation, this will be it */
 	struct nf_conn *master;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 1bdae8f188e1f..d507d0fc7858a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1124,9 +1124,9 @@ __nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net,
 	*(unsigned long *)(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode.pprev) = hash;
 	ct->status = 0;
 	write_pnet(&ct->ct_net, net);
-	memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0,
+	memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset, 0,
 	       offsetof(struct nf_conn, proto) -
-	       offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset[0]));
+	       offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset));
 
 	nf_ct_zone_add(ct, zone);
 
-- 
2.20.1