linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 59/90] gcc-10 warnings: fix low-hanging fruit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200518173503.116845220@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 19:36:37 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 59/90] gcc-10 warnings: fix low-hanging fruit

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

commit 9d82973e032e246ff5663c9805fbb5407ae932e3 upstream.

Due to a bug-report that was compiler-dependent, I updated one of my
machines to gcc-10.  That shows a lot of new warnings.  Happily they
seem to be mostly the valid kind, but it's going to cause a round of
churn for getting rid of them..

This is the really low-hanging fruit of removing a couple of zero-sized
arrays in some core code.  We have had a round of these patches before,
and we'll have many more coming, and there is nothing special about
these except that they were particularly trivial, and triggered more
warnings than most.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 include/linux/fs.h  |    2 +-
 include/linux/tty.h |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ struct file_handle {
 	__u32 handle_bytes;
 	int handle_type;
 	/* file identifier */
-	unsigned char f_handle[0];
+	unsigned char f_handle[];
 };
 
 static inline struct file *get_file(struct file *f)
--- a/include/linux/tty.h
+++ b/include/linux/tty.h
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ struct tty_buffer {
 	int read;
 	int flags;
 	/* Data points here */
-	unsigned long data[0];
+	unsigned long data[];
 };
 
 /* Values for .flags field of tty_buffer */