[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200518173515.227305757@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 19:36:39 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 067/114] netfilter: conntrack: avoid gcc-10 zero-length-bounds warning
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
[ Upstream commit 2c407aca64977ede9b9f35158e919773cae2082f ]
gcc-10 warns around a suspicious access to an empty struct member:
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c: In function '__nf_conntrack_alloc':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1522:9: warning: array subscript 0 is outside the bounds of an interior zero-length array 'u8[0]' {aka 'unsigned char[0]'} [-Wzero-length-bounds]
1522 | memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:37:
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:90:5: note: while referencing '__nfct_init_offset'
90 | u8 __nfct_init_offset[0];
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The code is correct but a bit unusual. Rework it slightly in a way that
does not trigger the warning, using an empty struct instead of an empty
array. There are probably more elegant ways to do this, but this is the
smallest change.
Fixes: c41884ce0562 ("netfilter: conntrack: avoid zeroing timer")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h | 2 +-
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
index 93bbae8f96414..b6dbc80b6ed15 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ struct nf_conn {
struct hlist_node nat_bysource;
#endif
/* all members below initialized via memset */
- u8 __nfct_init_offset[0];
+ struct { } __nfct_init_offset;
/* If we were expected by an expectation, this will be it */
struct nf_conn *master;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index a79f5a89cab14..8064d769c953c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1208,9 +1208,9 @@ __nf_conntrack_alloc(struct net *net,
*(unsigned long *)(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode.pprev) = hash;
ct->status = 0;
write_pnet(&ct->ct_net, net);
- memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset[0], 0,
+ memset(&ct->__nfct_init_offset, 0,
offsetof(struct nf_conn, proto) -
- offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset[0]));
+ offsetof(struct nf_conn, __nfct_init_offset));
nf_ct_zone_add(ct, zone);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists