linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 49/80] gcc-10: disable array-bounds warning for now

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200518173500.338372416@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 18 May 2020 19:37:07 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 49/80] gcc-10: disable array-bounds warning for now

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

commit 44720996e2d79e47d508b0abe99b931a726a3197 upstream.

This is another fine warning, related to the 'zero-length-bounds' one,
but hitting the same historical code in the kernel.

Because C didn't historically support flexible array members, we have
code that instead uses a one-sized array, the same way we have cases of
zero-sized arrays.

The one-sized arrays come from either not wanting to use the gcc
zero-sized array extension, or from a slight convenience-feature, where
particularly for strings, the size of the structure now includes the
allocation for the final NUL character.

So with a "char name[1];" at the end of a structure, you can do things
like

       v = my_malloc(sizeof(struct vendor) + strlen(name));

and avoid the "+1" for the terminator.

Yes, the modern way to do that is with a flexible array, and using
'offsetof()' instead of 'sizeof()', and adding the "+1" by hand.  That
also technically gets the size "more correct" in that it avoids any
alignment (and thus padding) issues, but this is another long-term
cleanup thing that will not happen for 5.7.

So disable the warning for now, even though it's potentially quite
useful.  Having a slew of warnings that then hide more urgent new issues
is not an improvement.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 Makefile |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -794,6 +794,7 @@ KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warni

 # We'll want to enable this eventually, but it's not going away for 5.7 at least
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, zero-length-bounds)
+KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, array-bounds)

 # Enabled with W=2, disabled by default as noisy
 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, maybe-uninitialized)